The short answer is that both break strong taboos in many (but not all) of the world's cultures. The slightly longer answer is that murder (in particular) removes the individual's free will, violating one of the main principles of Western thought.Why don't people see mass murder/suicide as a form of population control or abortion?
First of all, the people that are committing these atrocities, are evil, to the core. Second of all, God is very capable of deciding who and how to create population controls... So, to answer your question, people, or I should say sane people, people with a heart or a conscious don't think that mass murder, suicide, and abortion are appropriate forms of population control because they are not population control, they are act of pure evil. The people that God brings into this world are here because He allowed them to be. That is not to say that Evil cannot prevail from evil minded people.
I hope you can change your way of thinking, because right now, with this question, you are way off.Why don't people see mass murder/suicide as a form of population control or abortion?
What if you were one to be killed for ';population control'; ?
Well some people do, and they are usually crazy.
Tuesday, August 24, 2010
Whats the best form of birth control?
I'm married, want to have sex and I've already had a little one and I know that abstinence is the best way blah blah blah blah...Whats the best form of birth control?
Talk to your doctor- there are plenty of easy birth control methods out there now. The pill being the most effective and proven method- it allows you to have sex without extra protection (read: more fun!) It also regulates your menstrual cycle.
There are of course many more options besides barrier methods which, for married couples, aren't the best solution. Vaginal ring, IUD, the patch, DepoProvera... just to name a few!Whats the best form of birth control?
Well, depends on what is important to you when you think about birth control.
For me, I abhor anything that does upheavals to my hormones as I believe more in holistic health. Thus, I will NEVER choose to use pills.
So I dun really have much choice left but to use the condom.
However, that is not a very good way as the protection is only 90% max. My son was concieved while i used a condom... ;)
So it really depends on what is important to you. Are you looking for convenience, how it affects our health or effectiveness?
Vasectomy works all the time.
all of them are good but you should see your nurse to see what is better for you
Talk to your doctor- there are plenty of easy birth control methods out there now. The pill being the most effective and proven method- it allows you to have sex without extra protection (read: more fun!) It also regulates your menstrual cycle.
There are of course many more options besides barrier methods which, for married couples, aren't the best solution. Vaginal ring, IUD, the patch, DepoProvera... just to name a few!Whats the best form of birth control?
Well, depends on what is important to you when you think about birth control.
For me, I abhor anything that does upheavals to my hormones as I believe more in holistic health. Thus, I will NEVER choose to use pills.
So I dun really have much choice left but to use the condom.
However, that is not a very good way as the protection is only 90% max. My son was concieved while i used a condom... ;)
So it really depends on what is important to you. Are you looking for convenience, how it affects our health or effectiveness?
Vasectomy works all the time.
all of them are good but you should see your nurse to see what is better for you
How about this form of gun control?
Kennesaw currently has 30,000 residents.
In March 1982, 25 years ago, the small town of Kennesaw 鈥?responding to a handgun ban in Morton Grove, Ill. 鈥?unanimously passed an ordinance requiring each head of household to own and maintain a gun. Since then, despite dire predictions of ';Wild West'; showdowns and increased violence and accidents, not a single resident has been involved in a fatal shooting 鈥?as a victim, attacker or defender.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news鈥?/a>How about this form of gun control?
Big Smalls...Kennesaw is still very much metro Atlanta and within Cobb County which does have a lot of crime. Of course the city limits of Atlanta will have more crime, all inner cities do. But Kennesaw is an example of how law abiding gun ownership doesn't increase crime as liberals love to believe.How about this form of gun control?
As a resident of Georgia, I can assure you that the story is not as amazing as it seems. This IS the south. Have you ever been? Kennesaw isn't in any way the same as the city of Atlanta (for example), where the population is higher, and the demographic vastly different. Kennesaw, before the ordinance, didn't see the level of crime seen just 20 minutes down I-75, and still does not today. Your article isn't news to me, and changes nothing. Those who carry guns are more likely to be effected by incidents involving guns.
I say hell yeah. This is what our founding fathers would have wanted. Everyone should own at least one gun if not more. I love the 2nd ammendment. And believe me there will come a day when they want to take away everyone's guns. And that's the day someone will step on my porch asking for my guns and have a hole in their guts. God Bless Our Republic.
Every household in Switzerland is required to have a rifle.
It's the main reason why nobody's ever messed with Switzerland.
Interesting indeed but more study is required - would you support this law in down town Harlem ? Or Watts ?
Nobody ever messes with switzerland because they have those swiss army knives.
you are forgetting the part that it's a small town. Lets make every person in New York to maintain a gun... That will not work the same way at all.
Gun control is the ability to put the second bullet through the hole made by the first one.
That is amazing!
wow!! thats great gun control
I cant complain about this idea
if you show me your gun I'll show you mine
hehehe
In March 1982, 25 years ago, the small town of Kennesaw 鈥?responding to a handgun ban in Morton Grove, Ill. 鈥?unanimously passed an ordinance requiring each head of household to own and maintain a gun. Since then, despite dire predictions of ';Wild West'; showdowns and increased violence and accidents, not a single resident has been involved in a fatal shooting 鈥?as a victim, attacker or defender.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news鈥?/a>How about this form of gun control?
Big Smalls...Kennesaw is still very much metro Atlanta and within Cobb County which does have a lot of crime. Of course the city limits of Atlanta will have more crime, all inner cities do. But Kennesaw is an example of how law abiding gun ownership doesn't increase crime as liberals love to believe.How about this form of gun control?
As a resident of Georgia, I can assure you that the story is not as amazing as it seems. This IS the south. Have you ever been? Kennesaw isn't in any way the same as the city of Atlanta (for example), where the population is higher, and the demographic vastly different. Kennesaw, before the ordinance, didn't see the level of crime seen just 20 minutes down I-75, and still does not today. Your article isn't news to me, and changes nothing. Those who carry guns are more likely to be effected by incidents involving guns.
I say hell yeah. This is what our founding fathers would have wanted. Everyone should own at least one gun if not more. I love the 2nd ammendment. And believe me there will come a day when they want to take away everyone's guns. And that's the day someone will step on my porch asking for my guns and have a hole in their guts. God Bless Our Republic.
Every household in Switzerland is required to have a rifle.
It's the main reason why nobody's ever messed with Switzerland.
Interesting indeed but more study is required - would you support this law in down town Harlem ? Or Watts ?
Nobody ever messes with switzerland because they have those swiss army knives.
you are forgetting the part that it's a small town. Lets make every person in New York to maintain a gun... That will not work the same way at all.
Gun control is the ability to put the second bullet through the hole made by the first one.
That is amazing!
wow!! thats great gun control
I cant complain about this idea
if you show me your gun I'll show you mine
hehehe
Is organized religion a form of mind control?
YES!! There is always some ';holy'; or priest class who ';knows more than YOU do'; and they have the ';in'; with God- ONLY they can do ';the sacrifice'; (think of roman catholic- the mass is the daily sacrifice- the laity then eat it- the whole hierarchy understands the scripture, not the ';congregation';)
The Ayatollahs get blind followers- the JW's ';elders'; and Mormons too- their ';elders'; or whatever they call them- have the insight- and ought to be obeyed!! or else!
The Llamas used to be part of a very cruel ruling class too- it wasn't so lovely and peaceful as the myth built up about Nepal and Tibet is today!!!
The Brahmas looked down on the lower castes! It is the same everywhere!
NO, organized religions are NOT what God has in mind.
It's between us and God, personally. NO more ';go-betweens'; now, we have Christ, and Christ alone.Is organized religion a form of mind control?
yes. and so is the media...
just look around you and see how many people dress contrary to what they see on tv or the movies....
and why do people vote for the guy with the most publicity? why not the guy or gal with no publicity? why get your info from the tv when you can research the candidates yourself and NOT be told what to think about the person....Is organized religion a form of mind control?
I prefer to think of it this way:
';If organised religion is the opium of the masses, then disorganised religion is the marijuana of the lunatic fringe';
- Kerry Thornley
The thing is, people don't know that they have been brainwashed. That is WHY it is called ';mind control';. They claim religion is a conscious decision but they are not aware, it is only a symptom of social conditioning.
somehow to me it is because religion should be helping to find the god inside you but it seems that is not the direction of most religion....
It can be. That's why it's so hard to find a true church that focuses on God's teachings and doesn't include cultural/personal biases and temptations that can poison the ministry of the church.
Not necessarily. It depends on the religion in question.
Scriptures such as Matthew 24:14 shows that there would be a need for an organized group for that work to be accomplished.
Yes. I go to church to learn how to let God control my mind because I do not do a very good job of it.
No one forced me to be a Christian, I made a fully conscious decision.
No more so than TV.
Yes, in a nutshell, it is.
only if its cults that deny the trinity..
The Ayatollahs get blind followers- the JW's ';elders'; and Mormons too- their ';elders'; or whatever they call them- have the insight- and ought to be obeyed!! or else!
The Llamas used to be part of a very cruel ruling class too- it wasn't so lovely and peaceful as the myth built up about Nepal and Tibet is today!!!
The Brahmas looked down on the lower castes! It is the same everywhere!
NO, organized religions are NOT what God has in mind.
It's between us and God, personally. NO more ';go-betweens'; now, we have Christ, and Christ alone.Is organized religion a form of mind control?
yes. and so is the media...
just look around you and see how many people dress contrary to what they see on tv or the movies....
and why do people vote for the guy with the most publicity? why not the guy or gal with no publicity? why get your info from the tv when you can research the candidates yourself and NOT be told what to think about the person....Is organized religion a form of mind control?
I prefer to think of it this way:
';If organised religion is the opium of the masses, then disorganised religion is the marijuana of the lunatic fringe';
- Kerry Thornley
The thing is, people don't know that they have been brainwashed. That is WHY it is called ';mind control';. They claim religion is a conscious decision but they are not aware, it is only a symptom of social conditioning.
somehow to me it is because religion should be helping to find the god inside you but it seems that is not the direction of most religion....
It can be. That's why it's so hard to find a true church that focuses on God's teachings and doesn't include cultural/personal biases and temptations that can poison the ministry of the church.
Not necessarily. It depends on the religion in question.
Scriptures such as Matthew 24:14 shows that there would be a need for an organized group for that work to be accomplished.
Yes. I go to church to learn how to let God control my mind because I do not do a very good job of it.
No one forced me to be a Christian, I made a fully conscious decision.
No more so than TV.
Yes, in a nutshell, it is.
only if its cults that deny the trinity..
Is abstinence the best form of birth control?
Of course! It's 100% effective, there's no risk of STDs, it doesn't cost a dime, no risk of physical or emotional problems, and there's no sin involved! What could be better?Is abstinence the best form of birth control?
Of course it is!
Condoms, birth control pills, and other birth control methods are not 100% fool proof. They can still fail and result in pregnancy. If you are not ready to take on the responsibility of another human being, simply don't have sex.Is abstinence the best form of birth control?
It is the only form of birth control that is 100% effective
obviously
No, it isn't. Although abstinence is the only way to absolutely certain that pregnancy does not occur it will only work if you actually abstain. I think that having a backup plan in place is always a good idea.
yeseye makeup tips
Of course it is!
Condoms, birth control pills, and other birth control methods are not 100% fool proof. They can still fail and result in pregnancy. If you are not ready to take on the responsibility of another human being, simply don't have sex.Is abstinence the best form of birth control?
It is the only form of birth control that is 100% effective
obviously
No, it isn't. Although abstinence is the only way to absolutely certain that pregnancy does not occur it will only work if you actually abstain. I think that having a backup plan in place is always a good idea.
yes
Using birth control as a form of abortion?
so this was a weird thing i heard about using birth control pills to abort a fertalized egg. it was really strange and i was just curious about anyones take on it.
it was said that if you take 2 pills every two hours it was able to abort the egg and forcing you to have your period. the reason is because since you are taking so much of the pill that it is putting all this estrogen inside your body that it gives out and leads to a miscarriage.
it sounds pretty dangerous and poisonous to me.
your opinion?Using birth control as a form of abortion?
Actually, the method you describe is pretty much the same idea as plan B. it's what docs used to use before Plan B was offered. It's two pills three times a day for two days if I recall correctly (I had a close friends do it many years ago).
Plan B is just a concentrated dose of a slightly different hormone. Works the same way as if you go the birth control pill route. If you have an egg fertilized, the pills prevent it from implanting in your uterus. Not quite the same as abortion, which rips an implanted and growing fetus from your womb.
Personally, I don't consider them to be the same thing, although many who believe life begins at the moment of conception disagree. Here's how I think of it: if a fertilized egg can't turn into a baby without implantation, then how is it an unborn child? If you consider all fertilized eggs to be babies, then what about all those frozen embryos in fertility centers? If the fertility doc implants like 5, hoping one will catch, then would you say the other four were ';aborted'; because they didn't implant? What about the leftovers that aren't used because the couple gets pregnant? Should they be forced to bring all of those to term?
Just my perspective. Hope it helps. BTW, I am generally pro-life, but also choose to use my own mind to decide what is right and wrong.Using birth control as a form of abortion?
I suggest you get a new hobby dear. Try tatting or petit point.
It sounds unhealthy and just as disgusting. If you're against abortion, why would you force yourself into a miscarriage? It's hypocritical. I suppose it depends on how far along you are when you take it, but... I really don't see much of a difference. A day-after pill is one thing, but a force-miscarriage is just... wrong.
Yeah w/e ... I'm a Catholic school gurl, and abortions sound ok to me. are not bad.
Just to add:
If you take too many and the fetus doesnt abort and you actually deliver the baby will most likely come out with a lot of different birth defects (ie born with out a brain, and trust me I didnt believe it til I seen it for myself)
that doesnt seem safe!
one alternative is just to get 'the morning after pill' and use that.
hope this helps!
sounds very unhealthy and dangerous
I believe you would ebd up in the hospital and may still be pregnant!
pretty dangerous and poisonous.
It's not a good idea...sometimes the fetus will still form altho it will have abnormalities some of which are not compatable to life. Or you'll have a stillborn baby.
Cat curiosity get my drift...
i know somepeople may find they need to have an abortions but to do it on their own buy overdosing on birth control is murder and just plain wrong in my opinion.
but to answer your question, im not sure but it definately sounds dangerous to me. and irrisponsible not something i would not do
Technically: no. either someone has been giving you night mares, or giving out info wrong. It keeps the egg from fertilizing...so there is no baby in u in the first place so technically it is not a form of abortion...
babies are sweet! when ur ready, you should def have one!
Regular birth control doesn't work like that. Regular birth control on affects ovulation and prevents the fertilization of an egg. The morning after pill IS an abortive, it does not prevent ovulation, it does not prevent fertilization of an egg however it does (at least 85% of the time in CORRECT circumstances) prevent implantation of an already fertilized egg. I often question when young women will actually start listening to their doctors and pay attention to the information given with their regular birth control rather than rely on the undereducated old wive's tales they get from their peers. SIGH...no wonder so many teens are pregnant these days.
Wouldn't recommend it .
i wouldn't risk it. sounds like you could poison yourself
Plan B is now available in most drug stores. I would go that route instead of trying to take your birth control pills in large quantities. That does not sound safe.
it was said that if you take 2 pills every two hours it was able to abort the egg and forcing you to have your period. the reason is because since you are taking so much of the pill that it is putting all this estrogen inside your body that it gives out and leads to a miscarriage.
it sounds pretty dangerous and poisonous to me.
your opinion?Using birth control as a form of abortion?
Actually, the method you describe is pretty much the same idea as plan B. it's what docs used to use before Plan B was offered. It's two pills three times a day for two days if I recall correctly (I had a close friends do it many years ago).
Plan B is just a concentrated dose of a slightly different hormone. Works the same way as if you go the birth control pill route. If you have an egg fertilized, the pills prevent it from implanting in your uterus. Not quite the same as abortion, which rips an implanted and growing fetus from your womb.
Personally, I don't consider them to be the same thing, although many who believe life begins at the moment of conception disagree. Here's how I think of it: if a fertilized egg can't turn into a baby without implantation, then how is it an unborn child? If you consider all fertilized eggs to be babies, then what about all those frozen embryos in fertility centers? If the fertility doc implants like 5, hoping one will catch, then would you say the other four were ';aborted'; because they didn't implant? What about the leftovers that aren't used because the couple gets pregnant? Should they be forced to bring all of those to term?
Just my perspective. Hope it helps. BTW, I am generally pro-life, but also choose to use my own mind to decide what is right and wrong.Using birth control as a form of abortion?
I suggest you get a new hobby dear. Try tatting or petit point.
It sounds unhealthy and just as disgusting. If you're against abortion, why would you force yourself into a miscarriage? It's hypocritical. I suppose it depends on how far along you are when you take it, but... I really don't see much of a difference. A day-after pill is one thing, but a force-miscarriage is just... wrong.
Yeah w/e ... I'm a Catholic school gurl, and abortions sound ok to me. are not bad.
Just to add:
If you take too many and the fetus doesnt abort and you actually deliver the baby will most likely come out with a lot of different birth defects (ie born with out a brain, and trust me I didnt believe it til I seen it for myself)
that doesnt seem safe!
one alternative is just to get 'the morning after pill' and use that.
hope this helps!
sounds very unhealthy and dangerous
I believe you would ebd up in the hospital and may still be pregnant!
pretty dangerous and poisonous.
It's not a good idea...sometimes the fetus will still form altho it will have abnormalities some of which are not compatable to life. Or you'll have a stillborn baby.
Cat curiosity get my drift...
i know somepeople may find they need to have an abortions but to do it on their own buy overdosing on birth control is murder and just plain wrong in my opinion.
but to answer your question, im not sure but it definately sounds dangerous to me. and irrisponsible not something i would not do
Technically: no. either someone has been giving you night mares, or giving out info wrong. It keeps the egg from fertilizing...so there is no baby in u in the first place so technically it is not a form of abortion...
babies are sweet! when ur ready, you should def have one!
Regular birth control doesn't work like that. Regular birth control on affects ovulation and prevents the fertilization of an egg. The morning after pill IS an abortive, it does not prevent ovulation, it does not prevent fertilization of an egg however it does (at least 85% of the time in CORRECT circumstances) prevent implantation of an already fertilized egg. I often question when young women will actually start listening to their doctors and pay attention to the information given with their regular birth control rather than rely on the undereducated old wive's tales they get from their peers. SIGH...no wonder so many teens are pregnant these days.
Wouldn't recommend it .
i wouldn't risk it. sounds like you could poison yourself
Plan B is now available in most drug stores. I would go that route instead of trying to take your birth control pills in large quantities. That does not sound safe.
Why is Depo-Provera the best form of birth control? writing an essay for english class, need sources.?
Just curious - is this the topic you were assigned, or did you pick it?
There are a lot of pros and cons to every type of birth control...depo isn't necessarily the best. It's ';easy'; (a shot every three months), and for some women it can helps lighten flow/ease cramping. But...it's a synthetic hormone and can cause really unpleasant side-effects such as depression, calcium loss in your bones, weight-gain and loss of sex drive (among many others). Also, if you are using depo and plan to become pregnant, your body will need about a full year to return to fertility.
The ';best'; form of birth control, ultimately, is the one that will be used correctly every time, and has the least amount of objectionable side effects for the user.Why is Depo-Provera the best form of birth control? writing an essay for english class, need sources.?
Well, depends what you mean by ''best''. It is the most effective of all hormonal methods in preventing pregnancy, but it is also only to be used as a last resort when other methods aren't appropriate. It contains no estrogen, and a synthetic version of progesterone. The side effects include more weight gain than the pill (11 lbs vs 4 lbs), mood swings, it lowers the calcium in your bone (bone density loss) so you need to take a calcium supplement while on it, and you should not use it longer than two consecutive years. After you quit taking Depo it can take 9 months to resume a regular menstrual cycle and become fertile again. I am on it and I love it, but I understand the risks involved. A lot of women will tear it apart because they're not familiar with the pharmacology behind it and used it without educating themselves first and then experienced some of the many side effects. They advertise no period, but only about 50% of users lose it completely. Others spot, some quite continuously.
That said, you don't have to take a pill every day, it's effective for three months, it is most effective of all hormonal methods, it's cheap (~$40 a shot), and it can also be used as treatment for endometriosis.
If you're looking for real sources use Google Scholar and find peer reviewed articles written by real doctors. They will be non-biased and accurate.
There are a lot of pros and cons to every type of birth control...depo isn't necessarily the best. It's ';easy'; (a shot every three months), and for some women it can helps lighten flow/ease cramping. But...it's a synthetic hormone and can cause really unpleasant side-effects such as depression, calcium loss in your bones, weight-gain and loss of sex drive (among many others). Also, if you are using depo and plan to become pregnant, your body will need about a full year to return to fertility.
The ';best'; form of birth control, ultimately, is the one that will be used correctly every time, and has the least amount of objectionable side effects for the user.Why is Depo-Provera the best form of birth control? writing an essay for english class, need sources.?
Well, depends what you mean by ''best''. It is the most effective of all hormonal methods in preventing pregnancy, but it is also only to be used as a last resort when other methods aren't appropriate. It contains no estrogen, and a synthetic version of progesterone. The side effects include more weight gain than the pill (11 lbs vs 4 lbs), mood swings, it lowers the calcium in your bone (bone density loss) so you need to take a calcium supplement while on it, and you should not use it longer than two consecutive years. After you quit taking Depo it can take 9 months to resume a regular menstrual cycle and become fertile again. I am on it and I love it, but I understand the risks involved. A lot of women will tear it apart because they're not familiar with the pharmacology behind it and used it without educating themselves first and then experienced some of the many side effects. They advertise no period, but only about 50% of users lose it completely. Others spot, some quite continuously.
That said, you don't have to take a pill every day, it's effective for three months, it is most effective of all hormonal methods, it's cheap (~$40 a shot), and it can also be used as treatment for endometriosis.
If you're looking for real sources use Google Scholar and find peer reviewed articles written by real doctors. They will be non-biased and accurate.
Subscribe to:
Posts
(Atom)